“Paper never refuses ink” (A Psychoanalytic Exploration) By Michael McArdle based in Longford

Paper Never Refuses Ink

In the unforgiving court of the mind, the sheet waits—unresisting, unquestioning, blank yet pregnant with possibility. It invites the letter. It accepts the stroke. And in that encounter, the psyche unshackles itself—projecting, confessing, accusing, pleading. A newspaper, after all, is not only a vessel of fact and fiction; it is a screen for unspoken longings, displaced anxieties, and the silent machinations of desire. When the authority figure becomes manic—driven by impulse and intoxicated by judgment—the resulting text becomes less reportage and more revelation of the unconscious. For the ink that meets the paper does not merely deliver narrative; it records the psychic tremors of authority and the societal appetite for spectacle.

The Blank Page and the Unconscious

In psychoanalytic thought, the blank page resembles the blank screen of the unconscious—a receptive surface upon which latent material is projected (Freud, 1915/1957). Writing functions like free association: ink flows inevitably to fill the emptiness. Paper never refuses ink. It allows the imprint of everything—fear, rage, ambition, shame. Yet this receptivity is not innocence. The blank field becomes complicit, a silent co-author of psychic outpouring.

When a newspaper prints a distorted account, it mirrors the psychic impulse to speak, to fill silence, to impose coherence. The manic authority becomes both author and patient, externalizing inner conflict through language (Kristeva, 1982). The article thus becomes a symptom rather than a statement. Beneath the narrative, the ink stains reveal unconscious motives: the law’s desire to dominate, the subject’s fear of exposure, and society’s compulsion to witness.

Authority and the Superego

The courtroom is one of the great theatres of the superego. The judge—or any authority figure—stands for the law, the moral ideal, the internalized parent (Freud, 1923/1961). But when that figure becomes manic, the superego collapses into excess. The authority that once mediated impulse begins to perform it. The manic judge’s voice is the superego unbound, a chorus of shoulds turned to shrill commands (Lacan, 1957/2006).

The newspaper that reports such mania becomes an extension of this authority, serving as the superego’s loudspeaker. Its columns assume the tone of moral decree, yet beneath them trembles an anxiety of control. The more manic the source, the more vehement the ink. Thus, the article’s moral certainty conceals its psychic instability. The newspaper becomes a medium of transference: readers unconsciously receive the authority’s projections and absorb them as moral truth (Mitchell, 1988)

Projection, Displacement, and Denial

Freud (1926/1959) identified defense mechanisms as the psyche’s strategies for preserving itself from internal conflict. Projection displaces the unacceptable impulse onto others; denial refuses reality; displacement substitutes one target for another. In the psychic economy of public narrative, these defenses thrive. A manic authority discharges internal tension through narrative production: an article becomes the displaced object of aggression or fear.

In psychoanalytic terms, the “facts” of a distorted article are never purely external; they are the return of repressed affect. The writer or institution disowns anxiety by locating it in another, declaring the “other” unstable, guilty, or corrupt. The paper receives this projection without resistance, as the psyche displaces its own instability onto ink. The phrase “paper never refuses ink” thus becomes a metaphor for the unconscious’s inability to censor its symptoms: what must be expressed, will be expressed.

The Reader as Subject and Mirror

Reading, too, is not an innocent act. The reader becomes implicated in the psychic drama, oscillating between identification and repudiation (Barthes, 1977). The newspaper article offers a position: to judge, to sympathize, to condemn. Psychoanalytically, this is the reader’s moment of transference. The manic energy of the text calls forth the reader’s own latent impulses toward authority or rebellion (Felman, 1982).

The reader may identify with the authority’s mania—momentarily enjoying its omnipotence—or recoil from it, affirming their own rational ego. Either way, the reader’s unconscious is engaged. The page becomes a mirror, reflecting not events but the structure of desire itself. As Lacan (1977) argued, the image of authority is never merely external; it is an internalized ideal that both shapes and torments the self.

The Over-Said and the Unsaid

When mania governs speech, language becomes excessive. The manic voice over-declares, over-explains, over-condemns—desperately warding off the return of silence (Kristeva, 1989). In psychoanalytic terms, over-speech is a defense against the void. The printed word, in its abundance, conceals what cannot be articulated.

Thus, an article drenched in certainty may be compensating for an unacknowledged fear. The verbosity of the text mirrors the psyche’s flight from the repressed. What is omitted—the silence between lines—often bears the truth (Benjamin, 1979). In analysis, the gaps, pauses, and contradictions reveal more than coherent speech ever could. Likewise, the newspaper’s omissions—what it chooses not to print—betray the unconscious of its institution.

The Return of the Repressed

For Freud (1919/1955), repression is never absolute; what is suppressed will return, distorted and displaced. A manic authority’s unprocessed anxieties resurface through public utterance, and the newspaper becomes the carrier of that return. The article that claims objectivity thus reveals its unconscious subtext: fear of chaos, loss of control, exposure of weakness (Laplance & Pontalis, 1973).

What appears as rational judgment is often a defense against psychic fragmentation. The newspaper’s columns, arranged neatly, mimic the ego’s desperate attempt to maintain order. Yet the manic tone betrays the intrusion of the repressed: the ink runs heavy, the adjectives swell, the narrative overflows. The reader, sensing instability, feels both fascination and unease—responses typical of the uncanny (Freud, 1919/1955).

The Paper as a Transitional Object

Winnicott (1953) described the “transitional object” as the medium between inner and outer reality—a teddy bear, a toy, or, symbolically, a text. The newspaper operates similarly. It occupies the space between psychic projection and external world. The manic authority’s inner conflict materializes as public narrative, allowing temporary relief. The page becomes a holding environment for collective anxiety (Bollas, 1987).

But unlike the child’s toy, the newspaper’s ink solidifies the fantasy. Once printed, the projection is fixed—an object of belief and circulation. This fixity transforms psychic turbulence into social fact. The untruth becomes institutionally embodied; the symptom becomes record

Responsibility and the Analyst’s Gaze

If the newspaper is a surface of projection, psychoanalysis demands that we assume the position of the analyst: to listen, to question, to interpret. The analyst does not erase the symptom; they read it (Lacan, 1966/2001). Similarly, we must read the ink not for its declared truth but for its latent content. What desire motivates this sentence? What fear animates this tone?

The reader who becomes analyst refuses the seduction of certainty. Instead, they attend to slips, metaphors, and inconsistencies—those “Freudian stains” that betray unconscious processes (Ricoeur, 1970). Responsibility begins with this analytic gaze. The newspaper may not refuse ink, but the reader can refuse blind belief. In doing so, they reclaim authorship of meaning.

Conclusion: The Page as Witness

In the end, the blank sheet—now saturated with ink—serves as witness. Not merely to events, but to psychic dramas of authority, denial, projection, and vulnerability. When mania governs the pen, the newspaper becomes a confessional disguised as reportage. The paper, patient and silent, absorbs it all. It never refuses ink.

Yet psychoanalysis reminds us that ink is never only ink. It is condensation, displacement, return. It is the unconscious in visible form. And so, the challenge to the reflective reader is not to erase what has been written, but to read through it—to see in the manic text the trembling of the law, the wound of the psyche, and the endless human compulsion to make meaning, even in distortion. The ink remains; the truth must be read beneath it.

References

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text (S. Heath, Trans.). Hill and Wang.

Benjamin, W. (1979). One-way street and other writings (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Verso.

Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. Columbia University Press.

Felman, S. (1982). The literature of psychoanalysis: Reading Freud’s case studies. Yale University Press.

Freud, S. (1915/1957). The unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 159–215). Hogarth Press.

Freud, S. (1919/1955). The uncanny. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition (Vol. 17, pp. 217–256). Hogarth Press.

Freud, S. (1923/1961). The ego and the id (J. Strachey, Trans.). Norton.

Freud, S. (1926/1959). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety (J. Strachey, Trans.). Norton.

Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

Kristeva, J. (1989). Black sun: Depression and melancholy (L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

Lacan, J. (1957/2006). The direction of the treatment and the principles of its power. In Écrits (B. Fink, Trans., pp. 489–542). Norton.

Laplance, J., & Pontalis, J.-B. (1973). The language of psychoanalysis (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Norton.

Mitchell, J. (1988). Women: The longest revolution. Virago.

Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation. Yale University Press.

Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34(2), 89–97.